March 11, 2010 <Back to Index>
|
Helmuth James Graf von Moltke was born in Kreisau (now
Krzyżowa, Poland) in the Province of Silesia. His mother, Dorothy
(née Rose-Innes), was a South African of British descent,
the daughter of Sir James Rose-Innes, the highest judge in
the Union of South Africa. Moltke's parents were members of
the Christian Science church,
and his father was a Christian Science practitioner and teacher and one
of the translators of the German edition of the Christian Science
textbook, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures by Mary
Baker Eddy. From
1927 to 1929, Moltke studied legal and political
sciences in Breslau, Vienna, Heidelberg,
and Berlin. In 1931 he married Freya Deichmann, whom he met
in Austria. In 1928 Moltke became involved with college teachers
and youth movement leaders in the organization of
the Löwenberger Arbeitsgemeinschaften (Löwenberg
Labour Community) in which jobless young workers and
young farmers were brought together
with students so they could learn from each other. They also
discussed civics,
obligations, and rights. In Kreisau, Moltke set aside an unused part of
the estate for farming startups, which earned him harsh criticism from
neighbouring landowners. In
1934, Moltke wrote his junior law examination. In 1935, he declined the
chance to become a judge because he would have been obliged to join
the Nazi Party. Instead, he opened a law practice in Berlin.
As a lawyer dealing in international law,
he helped victims of Hitler's régime emigrate, and traveled
abroad to maintain contacts. Between 1935 and 1938, Moltke regularly
visited Great Britain, where he completed English legal training
in London and Oxford. In
1939, World War II began with the German invasion
of Poland. Moltke was immediately drafted at the beginning of the
Polish campaign by the Abwehr —specifically, the High Command of the
Armed Forces (Oberkommando der Wehrmacht—OKW), Counter-Intelligence
Service, Foreign Division—under Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, as an expert
in martial law and international public law. Moltke's work for the
Abwehr mainly involved gathering insights from abroad,
from military attachés and foreign newspapers,
and news of military-political importance, and relaying this
information to the Wehrmacht. He maintained the connection between
the OKW and the Foreign Office, but above all to provide
appraisals of
questions of the international laws of war. In
his travels through German-occupied countries, he observed many human
rights abuses, which he attempted to thwart by insisting that Germany
observe the Geneva Convention (it continued not to) and
through local actions in creating more benign outcomes for local
inhabitants, citing legal principles. In
October 1941, Moltke wrote, "Certainly more than a thousand people are
murdered in this way every day, and another thousand German men are
habituated to murder... What shall I say when I am asked: And what did
you do during that time?" In the same letter he said, "Since Saturday
the Berlin Jews are being rounded up. Then they are sent off with what
they can carry.... How can anyone know these things and walk around
free?" Moltke
hoped that, with his appraisals, he could have a humanitarian effect on
military events, and was supported in this by anti-Hitler officers such
as Canaris and Major General Hans Oster, Chief of the Central
Division. During Nazi Germany's war with the Soviet Union, Moltke
wrote a controversial opinion urging Germany to follow both the Geneva
Convention and the Hague Convention,
in order to comply with international law and to promote reciprocal
good treatment for German prisoners of war; however he was overruled on
the grounds that Russia was not a signatory to the agreements, with
Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel describing the Geneva Convention
as "a product of a notion of chivalry of
a bygone era." He further acted on his opposition to the brutalities of
Nazism by ordering deportation of Jews to countries which provided safe
haven, and by writing reports emphasizing the psychological problems
German soldiers developed after witnessing and participating in mass
killings of Jews and Eastern Europeans. Having access to this
information, Moltke began to oppose both the war, and the entire
program of the Nazi party. Moltke
also surreptitiously spread the information to which he was privy,
regarding the war and the concentration camps, to friends outside
the Nazi party, including members of the resistance in
occupied Europe. Declassified British documents reveal that he twice
attempted to contact British officials, including friends
from Oxford,
offering to "go to any length" to assist them; however the British
refused the first time, confusing him with his uncle, the German
ambassador to Spain, and replied to the second offer by asking for
"deeds" rather than "talk". Moltke possessed strong religious
convictions and in a 1942 letter smuggled to a British
friend Lionel Curtis,
Moltke wrote: “Today, not a numerous, but an active part of the German
people are beginning to realize, not that they have been led astray,
not that bad times await them, not that the war may end in defeat, but
that what is happening is sin and that they are personally responsible
for each terrible deed that has been committed - naturally, not in the
earthly sense, but as Christians”. In the same letter, Moltke wrote
that before World War II, he had believed that it was possible to
be totally opposed to Nazism without
believing in God, but he now declared his former ideas to be "wrong,
completely wrong". In Moltke's opinion, only by believing in God could
one be a total opponent of the Nazis. In Berlin Moltke had a circle of acquaintances who opposed Nazism and
who met frequently there, but on three occasions met at Kreisau. These
three incidental gatherings were the basis for the term “Kreisau Circle.” The
meetings at Kreisau had an agenda of well-organized discussion topics,
starting with relatively innocuous ones as cover. The topics of the
first meeting of May, 1942 included the failure of German educational
and religious institutions to fend off the rise of Nazism. The theme of
the second meeting in the autumn of 1942 was on post-war
reconstruction, assuming the likely defeat of Germany. This included
both economic planning and self-government, developing a pan-European
concept that pre-dated the European Union by
nearly sixty years, summarized in documented resolutions. The third
meeting in June, 1943 addressed how to handle the legacy of Nazi war
crimes after the fall of the dictatorship. These and other meetings
resulted in “Principles for the New [Post-Nazi] Order” and “Directions
to Regional Commissioners”, works, which Moltke asked his wife, Freya,
to hide in a place that not even he knew. Moltke opposed the assassination of Hitler. He warned that if one succeeded, Hitler would become a martyr,
whereas if one were to fail, it would expose those few individuals
among the German leadership who could be counted on to build a
democratic state after the collapse of the Third Reich. On July 20, 1944 there was an attempt on Hitler's life,
which the Gestapo used as a pretext to eliminate perceived opponents to
the Nazi regime. In the aftermath of the plot some 5,000 of Hitler's
opponents were executed. Moltke's
mindset and his objections to orders that were at odds with
international law were not without danger, and in January 1944, he was
arrested by the Gestapo. A year later, in January 1945, he stood, along
with several of his fellow régime opponents, before
the People's Court (Volksgerichtshof), presided over
by Roland Freisler. Because no evidence could be found that Moltke
had participated in any conspiracy to bring about a coup
d'état, Freisler had to invent a charge de novo. Since
Moltke and his friends had discussed a Germany based on moral and
democratic principles that could develop after Hitler, Freisler deemed
this discussion as treason, a crime worthy of death. Hanns Lilje
writes in his autobiography that as Moltke stood before the
Volksgerichtshof,
he had "possessed, in the face of clear recognition of the fact that
the death penalty had already been decided, the moral courage for an
attack on Freisler and the whole institution". In two letters written
to his wife in January 1945 while imprisoned at Tegel,
Moltke noted with considerable pride that he was to be executed for his
ideas, not his actions, a point that had been underlined a number of
times by Freisler. In one letter, Moltke noted "Thus it is documented,
that not plans, not preparations, but the spirit as such shall be
persecuted. Vivat Freisler!" In
the second letter, Moltke claimed that he stood before the court
"...not as a Protestant, not as a great landowner, not as an
aristocrat, not as a Prussian, not as a German...but as a Christian and
nothing else". He
wrote: "But what the Third Reich is so terrified of ... is ultimately
the following: a private individual, your husband, of whom it is
established that he discussed with 2 clergymen of both denominations
[Protestant and Catholic] ... questions of the practical, ethical
demands of Christianity. Nothing else; for that alone we are
condemned.... I just wept a little, not because I was sad or melancholy
... but because I am thankful and moved by this proof of God's
presence." Moltke was
sentenced to death on 11 January 1945 and executed twelve days later
at Plötzensee Prison in Berlin. In a letter written while in custody,
he revealed his motivation for resistance to his two sons:
"Since National Socialism came
to power, I have striven to make its consequences milder for its
victims and to prepare the way for a change. In that, my conscience
drove me – and in the end, that is a man's duty." |