April 28, 2011 <Back to Index>
PAGE SPONSOR |
Karl Kraus (April 28, 1874 – June 12, 1936) was an Austrian writer and journalist, known as a satirist, essayist, aphorist, playwright and poet. He is regarded as one of the foremost German language satirists of the 20th century, especially for his witty criticism of the press, German culture, and German and Austrian politics. Kraus was born into a wealthy Jewish family of Jacob Kraus, a papermaker, and his wife Ernestine, née Kantor, in Gitschin, Bohemia (now Jičín in the Czech Republic). The family moved to Vienna in 1877. His mother died in 1891. Kraus
enrolled as a law student at the University
of
Vienna in 1892.
Beginning in April of the same year he began contributing to the paper Wiener Literaturzeitung,
starting
with a critique of Gerhart
Hauptmann's Die
Weber. Around that time, he unsuccessfully tried to perform as an
actor in a small theater. In 1894 he changed his field of studies to
philosophy and German literature. He discontinued his studies in 1896.
His friendship with Peter
Altenberg began
about this time. In 1896
he left university without a diploma to begin work as an actor,
stage director and performer, joining the Jung
Wien (Young
Vienna) group, which included Peter
Altenberg, Leopold
Andrian, Hermann
Bahr, Richard
Beer-Hofmann, Felix
Dörmann, Hugo
von
Hofmannsthal, and Felix
Salten. In 1897, however, Kraus broke from this group with a biting
satire Die
demolierte Literatur (Demolished Literature), and was named Vienna correspondent for the newspaper Breslauer
Zeitung. One year later, as an uncompromising advocate of
Jewish assimilation, he attacked the founder of modern Zionism Theodor
Herzl with his
polemic Eine Krone
für Zion (A
Crown for Zion) (1898). On April
1, 1899, he renounced Judaism and in the same year
founded his own newspaper, Die
Fackel (The Torch),
which
he continued to direct, publish, and write until his death, and
from which he launched his attacks on hypocrisy, psychoanalysis, corruption of the Habsburg
empire, nationalism of the pan-German movement, laissez-faire economic policies, and
numerous other subjects. In 1901,
Kraus was sued by Hermann
Bahr and Emmerich
Bukovics, who felt they had been attacked by Die Fackel.
Many
lawsuits by diverse offended parties would follow in later years. Also
in 1901, Kraus found out that his publisher, Moriz Frisch, had taken
over his magazine while he was absent on a months long journey: Moriz
Frisch had registered the magazine's front cover as a trademark and
published the Neue
Fackel (New Torch).
Kraus
sued and won. From that time, Die Fackel was published (without a cover page) by the printer Jahoda & Siegel. While at
the beginning Die
Fackel was similar
to journals like the magazine Weltbühne,
it
became more and more a magazine that was privileged in its editorial
independence, which Kraus could provide by his funding. Die Fackel printed what Kraus wanted
to be printed. In its first decade, contributors included many
well-known writers and artists such as Peter
Altenberg, Richard
Dehmel, Egon
Friedell, Oskar
Kokoschka, Else
Lasker-Schüler, Adolf
Loos, Heinrich
Mann, Arnold
Schönberg, August
Strindberg, Georg Trakl, Frank
Wedekind, Franz
Werfel, Houston
Stewart
Chamberlain and Oscar
Wilde. After 1911, however, Kraus was usually the sole author.
Kraus' work was published nearly exclusively in Die Fackel, of which
922 irregularly issued numbers appeared in total. Authors who were
supported by Kraus include Peter
Altenberg, Else
Lasker-Schüler, and Georg
Trakl. Die
Fackel targeted
corruption, journalists and brutish behaviour. Notable enemies were Maximilian
Harden (in the mud
of the Harden-Eulenburg affair), Moriz
Benedikt (owner of
the newspaper Neue
Freie
Presse), Alfred
Kerr, Hermann
Bahr, Imre
Bekessy and Johannes
Schober. In 1902,
Kraus published Sittlichkeit
und
Kriminalität (Morality
and
Criminal Justice), for the first time commenting on what was to
become one of the main issues in his writings: the allegedly necessary
defense of sexual morality by means of criminal justice (Der Skandal
fängt an, wenn die Polizei ihm ein Ende macht, The scandal starts when
the police is stopping it). Starting in 1906, Kraus published the first of his aphorisms in Die Fackel; they
were collected in 1909 in the book Sprüche und Widersprüche (Sayings and Gainsayings). In
addition to his writings, Kraus gave numerous highly influential public
readings during his career - between 1892 and 1936 he put on approximately 700 one-man performances, reading from the dramas of Bertolt
Brecht, Gerhart
Hauptmann, Johann
Nestroy, Goethe, and Shakespeare,
and
also performing Offenbach's
operettas,
accompanied by piano and singing all the roles himself. Elias Canetti, who regularly attended Kraus' lectures, titled the second
volume of his autobiography "Die
Fackel"
im Ohr ("The
Torch" in the Ear) in reference to the magazine and its author. At
the peak of his popularity, Kraus' lectures attracted four thousand people, and his magazine sold forty thousand copies. In 1904,
Kraus supported Frank
Wedekind to make
possible the staging in Vienna of his controversial play, Pandora's
Box; the
play told the story of a sexually-enticing young dancer who rises in
German society through her relationships with wealthy men, but who
later falls into poverty and prostitution. The frank depiction of
sexuality and violence in these plays, including lesbianism and an encounter with Jack
the
Ripper, pushed
the boundaries of
what was considered acceptable on the stage at the time. Wedekind's
works are considered among the precursors of the expressionists, but in
1914, when expressionist poets like Richard
Dehmel sold
themselves to war propaganda, Kraus would become a fierce critic of them. In 1907,
Kraus attacked his erstwhile benefactor Maximilian
Harden because of
his role in the Eulenburg
trial in the first
of his spectacular Erledigungen (Dispatches). After
1911, Kraus was the sole author of most issues of Die Fackel. One of
Kraus' most influential satirical literary techniques, was his detournement of quotations. One example
controversy arose with the text Die
Orgie, which exposed how the newspaper Neue
Freie
Presse was
blatantly supporting Austria's
Liberal
Party's election campaign; the text was conceived as a
guerrilla prank and sent as a fake letter to the newspaper (Die
Fackel will publish
it later in 1911); the enraged editor, which fell into the trick,
responded by suing Kraus for "disturbing the serious business of
politicians and editors". After an
obituary for Franz
Ferdinand who had
been assassinated
in
Sarajevo on 28
June 1914, Die Fackel was not published for many months. In December 1914, it appeared again with an essay "In dieser
großen Zeit" ("In this grand time"): "In dieser großen
Zeit, die ich noch gekannt habe, wie sie so klein war; die wieder klein
werden wird, wenn ihr dazu noch Zeit bleibt; … in dieser lauten Zeit,
die da dröhnt von der schauerlichen Symphonie der Taten, die
Berichte hervorbringen, und der Berichte, welche Taten verschulden: in
dieser da mögen Sie von mir kein eigenes Wort erwarten." ("In this grand time that I
still know from when it was very small; that will become small again if
it has the time; … in this loud time that resounds from the ghastly
symphony of deeds that spawn reports, and from reports that are to
blame for deeds: in this one, you may not expect any word of my own.")
In the subsequent time, Kraus wrote against the World War, and editions
of Die Fackel were repeatedly confiscated
or obstructed by censors. Kraus'
masterpiece is generally considered to be the massive satiric play
about the First
World
War, Die
letzten
Tage der Menschheit (The
Last
Days of Mankind), which combines dialogue from
contemporary documents with apocalyptic fantasy and
commentary from two characters called "the Grumbler" and "the
Optimist". Kraus began to write the play in 1915 and first published it
as a series of special Fackel issues in 1919. Its
epilogue, "Die letzte Nacht" ("The last night") had already been
published in 1918 as a special issue. Edward
Timms has
called
the work a "faulted masterpiece" and a "fissured text" because the
evolution of Kraus' attitude during the time of its composition (from aristocratic conservative to democratic republican)
means
that the text has structural inconsistencies resembling a geological
fault. The play was first staged,
with more than sixty actors, by Italian director Luca
Ronconi in Turin in 1991, soon after the First
Gulf
War. Also in
1919, Kraus published his collected war texts under the title Weltgericht (World court of justice).
In
1920, he published the satire Literatur
oder
Man wird doch da sehn (Literature
or
You Ain't Seen Nothing Yet) as a reply to Franz
Werfel's Spiegelmensch (Mirror man), an
attack against Kraus. During
January 1924, he started to fight against Imre Békessy,
publisher of the tabloid Die
Stunde (The Hour).
Kraus
accused Békessy of extorting money from restaurant owners
by threatening them with bad reviews in his paper unless they paid him.
Békessy retaliated with a libel campagne against Kraus, who in
turn launched an Erledigung with the catchphrase
"Hinaus aus Wien mit dem Schuft!" ("Throw the scoundrel out of
Vienna"). In 1926, Békessy indeed fled Vienna in order to avoid
being arrested. Békessy achieved some later success when his
novel Barabbas was the monthly selection
of an American book club. In 1927,
a peak in Kraus's political commitment was his sensational attack on
powerful Vienna police chief Johann
Schober, also former two terms chancellor, after 84 people were
shot dead in the police massacre of the July
Revolt. Karl Kraus produced a poster that in a single sentence
requested Schober's resignation; the poster was published all over
Vienna and is considered an icon of Austrian 20th century history. In 1928,
the play Die
Unüberwindlichen (The
insurmountables) was published. It included allusions to the fights
against Békessy and Schober. During that same year, Kraus also
published the records of a lawsuit that Kerr had filed against him
after Kraus had published Kerr's war poems in Die Fackel. In 1932,
Kraus translated Shakespeare's sonnets. Kraus
supported the Social
Democratic
Party of Austria since
at
least the early 1920s. And in 1934, estranging
himself from some of his followers, he supported Engelbert
Dollfuss' coup d'état that established the Austrian fascist
regime, hoping Dollfuß could prevent Nazism from engulfing
Austria. One of
his last works, which he declined to publish for fear of Nazi
reprisals, was the verbally rich, densely allusive anti-Nazi polemic Die Dritte Walpurgisnacht (The Third Walpurgis
Night) of 1933. This satire on Nazi ideology begins with the
now-famous sentence, "Mir fällt zu Hitler nichts ein" (Hitler
brings nothing to my mind). However, lengthy extracts appear in his
apologia for his silence at Hitler's coming to power, Warum die Fackel nicht
erscheint (Why
the Fackel Does Not Appear), a 315-page edition of his periodical.
The last issue of the Fackel appeared in February 1936.
Karl Kraus died of an embolism of the heart in Vienna on
June 12, 1936 after a short illness. Kraus
never married, but from 1913 until his death, he had a conflict-prone
but close relationship with the Baroness Sidonie Nádherný
von Borutin (1885 – 1950). Many of his works were written in the
Janowitz
castle, a Nádherny family property. Sidonie Nádherny
became
an important pen-friend and addressee of books and poems. In 1911
he was baptized as a Catholic,
but
in 1923, disillusioned over the Church's support for the war, he
left the Catholic
Church, claiming sarcastically that he was motivated "primarily by
antisemitism", i.e. indignation at Max
Reinhardt's use of the Kollegienkirche in Salzburg as the venue
for a theatrical performance. Kraus is buried in the Zentralfriedhof cemetery outside Vienna. Kraus was
the subject of two books written by noted libertarian author Dr. Thomas
Szasz. Karl
Kraus and the Soul Doctors and Anti-Freud: Karl
Kraus's Criticism of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry portrayed Kraus as a harsh
critic of Sigmund
Freud and of psychoanalysis in general. Other
commentators, such as Edward
Timms, have argued that Kraus respected Freud, though with
reservations about the application of some of his theories, and that
his views were far less black-and-white than Szasz suggests. |