March 11, 2011 <Back to Index>
PAGE SPONSOR |
Torquato Tasso (11 March 1544 – 25 April 1595) was an Italian poet of the 16th century, best known for his poem La Gerusalemme liberata (Jerusalem Delivered, 1580), in which he depicts a highly imaginative version of the combats between Christians and Muslims at the end of the First Crusade, during the siege of Jerusalem. He suffered from mental illness and died a few days before he was due to be crowned as the king of poets by the Pope. Until the beginning of the 19th century, Tasso remained one of the most widely read poets in Europe. Born in Sorrento, he was the son of Bernardo Tasso, a nobleman of Bergamo and an epic and lyric poet of considerable fame in his day, and his wife Porzia de Rossi, a noblewoman from Tuscany. His father had for many years been secretary in the service of Ferrante Sanseverino, prince of Salerno, and his mother was closely connected with the most illustrious Neapolitan families. The prince of Salerno came into collision with the Spanish government of Naples, was outlawed, and was deprived of his hereditary fiefs. Tasso's father shared in this disaster of his patron. He was proclaimed a rebel to the state, together with his son Torquato, and his patrimony was sequestered. These things happened during the boy's childhood. In 1552 he was living with his mother and his only sister Cornelia at Naples, pursuing his education under the Jesuits, who had recently opened a school there. The precocity of intellect and the religious fervour of the boy attracted general admiration. At the age of eight he was already famous. Soon after this date he joined his father, who then resided in great poverty, an exile and without occupation, in Rome. News reached them in 1556 that Porzia Tasso had died suddenly and mysteriously at Naples. Her husband was firmly convinced that she had been poisoned by her brother with the object of getting control over her property. As it subsequently happened, Porzia's estate never descended to her son; and the daughter Cornelia married below her birth, at the instigation of her maternal relatives. Tasso's father was a poet by predilection and a professional courtier. Therefore, when an opening at the court of Urbino was offered in 1557, Bernardo Tasso gladly accepted it. The young Torquato, a handsome and brilliant lad, became the companion in sports and studies of Francesco Maria della Rovere, heir to the duke of Urbino. At Urbino a society of cultivated men pursued the aesthetical and literary studies which were then in vogue. Bernardo Tasso read cantos of his Amadigi to the duchess and her ladies, or discussed the merits of Homer and Virgil, Trissino and Ariosto, with the duke's librarians and secretaries. Torquato grew up in an atmosphere of refined luxury and somewhat pedantic criticism, both of which gave a permanent tone to his character. At Venice,
where his father went to superintend the printing of his own epic,
Amadigi (1560), these influences continued. He found himself the pet
and prodigy of a distinguished literary circle. But Bernardo had
suffered in his own career so seriously from dependence on the Muses
and the nobility that he now determined on a lucrative profession for
his son. Torquato was sent to study law at Padua. Instead of applying himself to law, the young man bestowed all his attention upon philosophy and poetry. Before the end of 1562, he had produced a narrative poem called Rinaldo, which was meant to combine the regularity of the Virgilian with the attractions of the romantic epic. In the attainment of this object, and in all the minor qualities of style and handling, Rinaldo showed
such marked originality that its author was proclaimed the most
promising poet of his time. The flattered father allowed it to be
printed; and, after a short period of study at Bologna, he consented to his son's entering the service of Cardinal Luigi d'Este. In 1565, Tasso for the first time set foot in that castle at Ferrara which was destined for him to be the scene of so many glories, and such cruel sufferings. After the publication of Rinaldo he had expressed his views upon the epic in some Discourses on the Art of Poetry, which committed him to a distinct theory and gained for him the
additional celebrity of a philosophical critic. The age was nothing if
not critical; but it may be esteemed a misfortune for the future author
of the Gerusalemme that
he should have started with pronounced opinions upon art. Essentially a
poet of impulse and instinct, he was hampered in production by his own
rules. The
five years between 1565 and 1570 seem to have been the happiest of
Tasso's life, although his father's death in 1569 caused his
affectionate nature profound pain. Young, handsome, accomplished in all
the exercises of a well-bred gentleman, accustomed to the society of
the great and learned, illustrious by his published works in verse and
prose, he became the idol of the most brilliant court in Italy. The
first two books of his five hundred odd love poems were sequences
addressed to his first loves, Lucrezia Bendidio and Laura Peperara, court ladies and illustrious singers. The princesses Lucrezia and Leonora d'Este,
both unmarried, both his seniors by about ten years, took him under
their protection. He was admitted to their familiarity. He owed much to
the constant kindness of both sisters. In 1570 he traveled to Paris with the cardinal. Frankness
of speech and a certain habitual want of tact caused a disagreement
with his worldly patron. He left France next year, and took service
under Duke Alfonso II of Ferrara. The most important events in Tasso's biography during the following four years are the publication of Aminta in 1573 and the completion of Gerusalemme Liberata in 1574. Aminta is a pastoral drama of very simple plot, but of exquisite lyrical charm. It appeared at the moment when music, under Palestrina's impulse, was becoming the main art of Italy. The honeyed melodies and sensuous melancholy of Aminta exactly suited and interpreted the spirit of its age. Its influence, in opera and cantata, was felt through two successive centuries. The Gerusalemme Liberata occupies
a larger space in the history of European literature, and is a more
considerable work. Yet the commanding qualities of this epic poem,
those which revealed Tasso's individuality, and which made it
immediately pass into the rank of classics, beloved by the people no
less than by persons of culture, are akin to the lyrical graces of Aminta. Its hero was Godfrey of Bouillon, the leader of the first Crusade; the climax of the epic was the capture of the holy city. It
was finished in Tasso's thirty-first year; and when the manuscripts lay
before him the best part of his life was over, his best work had been
already accomplished. Troubles immediately began to gather round him. Instead of having the courage to obey his own instinct, and to publish the Gerusalemme as he had conceived it, he yielded to the critical scrupulosity which formed a secondary feature of his character. The
poem was sent in manuscript to several literary men of eminence, Tasso
expressing his willingness to hear their strictures and to adopt their
suggestions unless he could convert them to his own views. The result
was that each of these candid friends, while expressing in general high
admiration for the epic, took some exception to its plot, its title,
its moral tone, its episodes or its diction, in detail. One wished it
to be more regularly classical; another wanted more romance. One hinted
that the Inquisition would not tolerate its supernatural machinery; another demanded the excision of its most charming passages, the loves of Armida, Clorinda and Erminia. Tasso had to defend himself against all these ineptitudes and
pedantries, and to accommodate his practice to the theories he had
rashly expressed. As in the Rinaldo, so also in the Jerusalem Delivered,
he aimed at ennobling the Italian epic style by preserving strict unity
of plot and heightening poetic diction. He chose Virgil for his model,
took the first crusade for subject, infused the fervour of religion into his conception of the hero Godfrey.
But his natural bias was for romance. In
spite of the poet's ingenuity and industry the stately main theme
evinced less spontaneity of genius than the romantic episodes with
which he adorned it, as he had done in Rinaldo. Godfrey, a mixture of pious Aeneas and Tridentine Catholicism, is not the real hero of the Gerusalemme. Fiery and passionate Rinaldo, Ruggiero, melancholy impulsive Tancredi, and the chivalrous Saracens with whom they clash in love and war, divide the reader's interest and divert it from Goffredo. The action of the epic turns on Armida,
the beautiful witch, sent forth by the infernal senate to sow discord
in the Christian camp. She is converted to the true faith by her
adoration for a crusading knight, and quits the scene with a phrase of
the Virgin Mary on her lips. Brave Clorinda dons armour like Marfisa, fighting in a duel with her devoted lover and receiving baptism from his hands at the time of her pathetic death; Erminia seeks
refuge in the shepherds' hut. These lovely pagan women, so touching in
their sorrows, so romantic in their adventures, so tender in their
emotions, rivet the readers' attention, while the battles, religious
ceremonies, conclaves and stratagems of the campaign are easily
skipped. The truth is that Tasso's great invention as an artist was the
poetry of sentiment. Sentiment, not sentimentality, gives value to what
is immortal in the Gerusalemme.
It was a new thing in the 16th century, something concordant with a
growing feeling for woman and with the ascendant art of music. This
sentiment, refined, noble, natural, steeped in melancholy, exquisitely
graceful, pathetically touching, breathes throughout the episodes of the Gerusalemme, finds metrical expression in the languishing cadence of
its mellifluous verse, and sustains the ideal life of those seductive
heroines whose names were familiar as household words to all Europe in
the 17th and 18th centuries. Tasso's
self-chosen critics were not men to admit what the public has since
accepted as incontrovertible. They vaguely felt that a great and
beautiful romantic poem was imbedded in a dull and not very correct
epic. In their uneasiness they suggested every course but the right
one, which was to publish the Gerusalemme without further dispute. Tasso,
already overworked by his precocious studies, by exciting court-life
and exhausting literary industry, now grew almost mad with worry. His
health began to fail him. He complained of headache, suffered from malarious fevers, and wished to leave Ferrara. The Gerusalemme was laid in manuscript upon a shelf. He opened negotiations with the court of Florence for
an exchange of service. This irritated the duke of Ferrara. Alfonso
hated nothing more than to see courtiers leave him for a rival duchy.
Alfonso thought, moreover, that, if Tasso were allowed to go, the Medici would
get the coveted dedication of that already famous epic. Therefore he
bore with the poet's humours, and so contrived that the latter should
have no excuse for quitting Ferrara. Meanwhile, through the years 1575,
1576 and 1577, Tasso's health grew worse. Jealousy
inspired the courtiers to malign and insult him. His irritable and
suspicious temper, vain and sensitive to slights, rendered him only too
easy a prey to their malevolence. In the 1570s Tasso developed a
persecution mania which led to legends about the restless, half-mad,
and misunderstood author. He became consumed by thoughts that his
servants betrayed his confidence, fancied he had been denounced to the Inquisition,
and expected daily to be poisoned. Literary and political events
surrounding him contributed to upsets and the mental state, with
troubles, stress and social troubles escalating. In
the autumn of 1576 Tasso quarrelled with a Ferrarese gentleman,
Maddalo, who had talked too freely about some same-sex love affair; the
same year he wrote a letter to his homosexual friend Luca Scalabrino
dealing with his own love for a twenty-one year old young man Orazio
Ariosto; in the summer of 1577 he drew his knife upon a servant in the
presence of Lucrezia d'Este, duchess of Urbino. For this excess he was arrested; but the duke released him, and took him for a change of air to his country seat of Belriguardo. What happened there is not known. Some
biographers have surmised that a compromising liaison with Leonora
d'Este came to light, and that Tasso agreed to feign madness in order
to cover her honor. but of this there is no proof. It is only certain
that from Belriguardo he returned to a Franciscan convent at Ferrara,
for the express purpose of attending to his health. There the dread of
being murdered by the duke took firm hold on his mind. He escaped at
the end of July, disguised himself as a peasant, and went on foot to
his sister at Sorrento. The
conclusions were that Tasso, after the beginning of 1575, became the
victim of a mental malady, which, without amounting to actual insanity,
rendered him fantastical and insupportable, a cause of anxiety to his
patrons. There
is no evidence whatsoever that this state of things was due to an
overwhelming passion for Leonora. The duke, contrary to his image as a
tyrant, showed considerable forbearance. He was a rigid and not
sympathetic man, as egotistical as a princeling of that age was wont to
be. But to Tasso he was never cruel; unintelligent perhaps, but far
from being that monster of ferocity which has been painted. The
subsequent history of his connection with the poet corroborates this
view. While
at Sorrento, Tasso yearned for Ferrara. The court-made man could not
breathe freely outside its charmed circle. He wrote humbly requesting
to be taken back. Alfonso consented, provided Tasso would agree to
undergo a medical course of treatment for his melancholy. When he
returned, which he did with alacrity under those conditions, he was
well received by the ducal family. All
might have gone well if his old maladies had not revived. Scene
followed scene of irritability, moodiness, suspicion, wounded vanity
and violent outbursts. In the summer of 1578 he ran away again; travelled through Mantua, Padua, Venice, Urbino, Lombardy. In September he reached the gates of Turin on foot, and was courteously entertained by Emmanuel Philibert, Duke of Savoy.
Wherever he went, wandering like the world's rejected guest, he met
with the honour due to his illustrious name. Great folk opened their
houses to him gladly, partly in compassion, partly in admiration of his
genius. But he soon wearied of their society, and wore their kindness
thin by his querulous peevishness. It seemed, moreover, that life was
intolerable to him outside Ferrara. Accordingly he once more opened
negotiations with the duke; and in February 1579 he again set foot in
the castle. Alfonso was about to contract his third marriage, this time with a princess of the house of Mantua.
He had no children, and unless he got an heir, there was a probability
that his state would fall, as it did subsequently, to the Holy See.
The nuptial festivals, on the eve of which Tasso arrived, were not
therefore an occasion of great rejoicing for the elderly bridegroom. As
a forlorn hope he had to wed a third wife; but his heart was not
engaged and his expectations were far from sanguine. Tasso,
preoccupied as always with his own sorrows and his own sense of
dignity, made no allowance for the troubles of his master. Rooms below
his rank, he thought, had been assigned him; the Duke was engaged.
Without exercising common patience, or giving his old friends the
benefit of a doubt, he broke into terms of open abuse, behaved like a
lunatic, and was sent off without ceremony to the madhouse of St. Anna.
This happened in March 1579; and there he remained until July 1586.
Duke Alfonso's long-sufferance at last had given way. He firmly
believed that Tasso was insane, and he felt that if he were so St. Anna
was the safest place for him. Tasso had put himself in the wrong by his
intemperate conduct, but far more by that incomprehensible yearning
after the Ferrarese court which made him return to it again and yet
again. It
was no doubt very irksome for a man of Tasso's pleasure-loving,
restless and self-conscious spirit to be kept for more than seven years
in confinement. Yet one must weigh the facts of the case rather than
the fancies which have been indulged regarding them. After the first
few months of his incarceration he obtained spacious apartments,
received the visits of friends, went abroad attended by responsible
persons of his acquaintance, and corresponded freely with whomsoever he
chose to address. The letters written from St. Anna to the princes and
cities of Italy, to warm well-wishers, and to men of the highest
reputation in the world of art and learning, form the most valuable
source of information, not only on his then condition, but also on his
temperament at large. It is singular that he spoke always respectfully,
even affectionately, of the Duke. Some
critics have attempted to make it appear that he was hypocritically
kissing the hand which had chastised him, with the view of being
released from prison, but no one who has impartially considered the
whole tone and tenor of his epistles will adopt this opinion. What
emerges clearly from them is that he labored under a serious mental
disease, and that he was conscious of it. Meanwhile,
he occupied his uneasy leisure with copious compositions. The mass of
his prose dialogues on philosophical and ethical themes, which is very
considerable, belong to the years of imprisonment in St. Anna. Except
for occasional odes or sonnets — some written at request and only
rhetorically interesting, a few inspired by his keen sense of suffering
and therefore poignant — he neglected poetry. But everything which fell
from his pen during this period was carefully preserved by the
Italians, who, while they regarded him as a lunatic, somewhat
illogically scrambled for the very offscourings of his wit. Nor
can it be said that society was wrong. Tasso had proved himself an
impracticable human being; but he remained a man of genius, the most
interesting personality in Italy. Long ago his papers had been sequestered. In the year 1580, he heard that part of the Gerusalemme was
being published without his permission and without his corrections. The
following year, the whole poem was given to the world, and in the
following six months seven editions issued from the press. The prisoner
of St. Anna had no control over his editors; and from the masterpiece
which placed him on the level of Petrarch and Ariosto he
never derived one penny of pecuniary profit. A rival poet at the court
of Ferrara undertook to revise and edit his lyrics in 1582. This was Battista Guarini;
and Tasso, in his cell, had to allow odes and sonnets, poems of
personal feeling, occasional pieces of compliment, to be collected and
emended, without lifting a voice in the matter. A few years later, in 1585, two Florentine pedants of the Crusca Academy declared war against the Gerusalemme.
They loaded it with insults, which seem to those who read their
pamphlets now mere parodies of criticism. Yet Tasso felt bound to
reply; and he did so with a moderation and urbanity which prove him to
have been not only in full possession of his reasoning faculties, but a
gentleman of noble manners also. The man, like Hamlet,
was distraught through ill-accommodation to his circumstances and his
age; brain-sick he was undoubtedly; and this is the Duke of Ferrara's
justification for the treatment he endured. In the prison he bore
himself pathetically, peevishly, but never ignobly. He showed a
singular indifference to the fate of his great poem, a rare magnanimity
in dealing with its detractors. His own personal distress, that
terrible malaise of imperfect insanity, absorbed him. What
remained over, untouched by the malady, unoppressed by his
consciousness thereof, displayed a sweet and gravely-toned humanity.
The oddest thing about his life in prison is that he was always trying
to place his two nephews, the sons of his sister Cornelia, in
court-service. One of them he attached to Guglielmo I, Duke of Mantua, the other to Ottavio Farnese, Duke of Parma. After all his father's and his own lessons of life, he had not learned that the court was to be shunned like Circe by
an honest man. In estimating Duke Alfonso's share of blame, this wilful
idealization of the court by Tasso must be taken into account. That man
is not a tyrant's victim who moves heaven and earth to place his
sister's sons with tyrants. In 1586 Tasso left St. Anna at the solicitation of Vincenzo Gonzaga, Prince of Mantua. He followed his young deliverer to the city by the Mincio,
basked awhile in liberty and courtly pleasures, enjoyed a splendid
reception from his paternal town of Bergamo, and produced a meritorious
tragedy called Torrismondo.
But only a few months had passed when he grew discontented. Vincenzo
Gonzaga, succeeding to his father's dukedom of Mantua, had scanty
leisure to bestow upon the poet. Tasso felt neglected. In the autumn of
1587 he journeyed through Bologna and Loreto to Rome, and taking up his
quarters there with an old friend, Scipione Gonzaga, now Patriarch of Jerusalem. Next year he wandered off to Naples, where he wrote a dull poem on Monte Oliveto.
In 1589 he returned to Rome, and took up his quarters again with the
patriarch of Jerusalem. The servants found him insufferable, and turned
him out of doors. He fell ill, and went to a hospital. The patriarch in
1590 again received him. But Tasso's restless spirit drove him forth to
Florence. The Florentines said, "Actum est de eo." Rome once more, then
Mantua, then Florence, then Rome, then Naples, then Rome, then
Naples — such is the weary record of the years 1590-94. He endured a
veritable Odyssey of
malady, indigence and misfortune. To Tasso everything came amiss. He
had the palaces of princes, cardinals, patriarchs, nay popes, always
open to him. Yet he could rest in none. Gradually, in spite of all
veneration for the sacer vates, he made himself the laughing stock and bore of Italy. His health grew ever feebler and his genius dimmer. In 1592, he gave to the public a revised version of the Gerusalemme. It was called the Gerusalemme Conquistata.
All that made the poem of his early manhood charming he rigidly erased.
The versification was degraded; the heavier elements of the plot
underwent a dull rhetorical development. During the same year a prosaic
composition in Italian blank verse, called Le Sette Giornate,
saw the light. Nobody reads it now. It is only mentioned as one of
Tasso's dotages — a dreary amplification of the first chapter of Genesis. It
is singular that just in these years, when mental disorder, physical
weakness, and decay of inspiration seemed dooming Tasso to oblivion, his old age was cheered with brighter rays of hope. Pope Clement VIII ascended the papal chair in 1592. He and his nephew, Cardinal Aldobrandini of San Giorgio,
determined to befriend the poet. In 1594, they invited him to Rome.
There he was to receive the crown of laurels, as Petrarch had been
crowned, on the Capitol. Worn
out with illness, Tasso reached Rome in November. The ceremony of his
coronation was deferred because Cardinal Aldobrandini had fallen ill,
but the pope assigned him a pension; and, under the pressure of
pontifical remonstrance, Prince Avellino, who held Tasso's maternal
estate, agreed to discharge a portion of his claims by payment of a
yearly rent-charge. At
no time since Tasso left St. Anna had the heavens apparently so smiled
upon him. Capitolian honors and money were now at his disposal. Yet
fortune came too late. Before he wore the crown of poet laureate,
or received his pensions, he ascended to the convent of Sant'Onofrio,
on a stormy 1 April 1595. Seeing a cardinal's coach toil up the steep
Trasteverine Hill, the monks came to the door to greet it. From the
carriage stepped Tasso and told the prior he had come to die with him. He
died in Sant'Onofrio in April 1595. He was just past fifty-one; and the
last twenty years of his existence had been practically and
artistically ineffectual. At the age of thirty-one the Gerusalemme, was accomplished. The world too was already ringing with the music of Aminta.
More than this Tasso had naught to give to literature but those
succeeding years of derangement, exile, imprisonment, poverty and hope
deferred endear the man to readers. Elegiac and querulous as he must
always appear, Tasso was loved better in the Romantic period because he suffered through nearly a quarter of a century of slow decline and unexplained misfortune. Rime (Rhymes), nearly two thousand lyrics in nine books, were written between 1567 and 1593. Influenced by Petrarca's Canzoniere, they develop a research for musicality and are rich of delicate images and subtle sentiments; Galealto re di Norvegia, (1573-4) an unfinished tragedy, which later was finished with a new title: Re Torrismondo (1587). It is influenced by Sophocles's and Seneca's tragedies, and tells the story of princess Alvida of Norway, who is forcibly married off to the Goth king Torrismondo, when she is devoted to her childhood friend, king Germondo of Sweden; Dialoghi (Dialogues),
written between 1578 and 1594. These 28 texts deal with various issues,
from moral ones (love, virtue, nobility) to more mundane ones (masks,
play, courtly style, beauty). Sometimes Tasso touches major themes of
his time: for instance, religion vs. intellectual freedom; Christianity
vs. Islam at Lepanto; Discorsi del poema eroico, published in 1594. This is the main text to understand Tasso's poetics and was probably written during the long years of composing and revising Gerusalemme Liberata;
The disease Tasso began to suffer from is now believed to be schizophrenia. Legends describe him wandering the streets of Rome half
mad, convinced that he was being persecuted. At times he was imprisoned
for his own safety by the Duke in St. Anne's lunatic asylum. Though he
was never fully cured, he was able to function and resumed his writing.
The Gerusalemme was published by his friends Angelo Ingegneri and Febo Bonna, mostly with the consent of the poet. |