August 08, 2012 <Back to Index>
PAGE SPONSOR |
Francis Hutcheson (August 8, 1694 – August 8, 1746) was a philosopher born in Ireland to a family of Scottish Presbyterians who became one of the founding fathers of the Scottish Enlightenment. He is thought to have been born at Drumalig, in the parish of Saintfield, County Down, Ireland. Hutcheson was educated at Killyleagh, and went on to Scotland to study at the University of Glasgow, where he spent six years at first in the study of philosophy, classics and general literature, and afterwards in the study of theology, receiving his degree in 1712 and obtaining his license to preach within the Presbyterian church in 1716. However, facing suspicions about his "Irish" roots and his association with theologian John Simson (then under investigation by Scottish ecclesiastical courts), a ministry in Scotland was unlikely to be a success, so he left the church returning to Ireland to pursue a career in academia. He was induced to start a private academy in Dublin, where he taught for 10 years, studying philosophy on the side and producing his famous Inquiry (1725). In Dublin his literary attainments gained him the friendship of many prominent inhabitants. Among these was Archbishop of Dublin, William King, who refused to prosecute Hutcheson in the archbishop's court for keeping a school without the episcopal licence. Hutcheson's relations with the clergy of the Established Church, especially with King and with Hugh Boulter (the archbishop of Armagh) seem to have been cordial, and his biographer, speaking of "the inclination of his friends to serve him, the schemes proposed to him for obtaining promotion," etc., probably refers to some offers of preferment, on condition of his accepting episcopal ordination. While residing in Dublin, Hutcheson published anonymously the four essays he is best known by: the Inquiry concerning Beauty, Order, Harmony and Design, the Inquiry concerning Moral Good and Evil, in 1725, the Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections and Illustrations upon the Moral Sense, in 1728. The alterations and additions made in the second edition of these Essays were published in a separate form in 1726. To the period of his Dublin residence are also to be referred the Thoughts on Laughter (1725) (a criticism of Thomas Hobbes) and the Observations on the Fable of the Bees, being in all six letters contributed to Hibernicus' Letters, a periodical that appeared in Dublin (1725 - 1727, 2nd ed. 1734). At the end of the same period occurred the controversy in the London Journal with Gilbert Burnet (probably the second son of Dr Gilbert Burnet, bishop of Salisbury) on the "True Foundation of Virtue or Moral Goodness." All these letters were collected in one volume (Glasgow, 1772). In 1729, Hutcheson succeeded his old master, Gershom Carmichael, in the Chair of Moral Philosophy at
the University of Glasgow, being the first professor there to lecture
in English instead of Latin. It is curious that up to this time all his
essays and letters had been published anonymously, though their
authorship appears to have been well known. In 1730 he entered on the
duties of his office, delivering an inaugural lecture (afterwards
published), De naturali hominum socialitate (About the natural fellowship of mankind). He appreciated having leisure for his favourite studies; "non levi igitur laetitia commovebar cum almam matrem Academiam me, suum olim alumnum, in libertatem asseruisse audiveram." (I was, therefore, moved by no mean frivolous pleasure when I had heard that my alma mater had delivered me, its one time alumnus,
into freedom.) Yet the works on which Hutcheson's reputation rests had
already been published. During his time as a lecturer in Glasgow
College he taught Adam Smith, the economist and philosopher, upon whom his ideas had great influence on Smith's later work The Theory of Moral Sentiments. In addition to the works named, the following were published during Hutcheson's lifetime: a pamphlet entitled Considerations on Patronage (1735); Philosophiae moralis institutio compendiaria, ethices et jurisprudentiae naturalis elementa continens, lib. iii. (Glasgow, 1742); Metaphysicae synopsis ontologiam et pneumatologiam campleciens (Glasgow, 1742). The last work was published anonymously. After his death, his son, Francis Hutcheson published much the longest, though by no means the most interesting, of his works, A System of Moral Philosophy, in Three Books (2 vols.. London, 1755). To this is prefixed a life of the author, by Dr William Leechman,
professor of divinity in the University of Glasgow. The only remaining
work assigned to Hutcheson is a small treatise on Logic (Glasgow,
1764). This compendium, together with the Compendium of Metaphysics, was republished at Strassburg in 1722. Thus Hutcheson dealt with metaphysics, logic and ethics.
His importance is, however, due almost entirely to his ethical
writings, and among these primarily to the four essays and the letters
published during his time in Dublin. His standpoint has a negative and
a positive aspect; he is in strong opposition to Thomas Hobbes and Mandeville, and in fundamental agreement with Shaftesbury,
whose name he very properly coupled with his own on the title page of
the first two essays. Obvious and fundamental points of agreement
between the two authors include the analogy drawn between beauty and
virtue, the functions assigned to the moral sense, the position that
the benevolent feelings form an original and irreducible part of our
nature, and the unhesitating adoption of the principle that the test of
virtuous action is its tendency to promote the general welfare. It is easy to trace the influence of Hutcheson's ethical theories on the systems of Hume and Adam Smith.
The prominence given by these writers to the analysis of moral action
and moral approbation with the attempt to discriminate the respective
provinces of the reason and the emotions in these processes, is
undoubtedly due to the influence of Hutcheson. To a study of the
writings of Shaftesbury and Hutcheson we might, probably, in large
measure, attribute the unequivocal adoption of the utilitarian standard
by Hume, and, if this be the case, the name of Hutcheson connects
itself, through Hume, with the names of Priestley, Paley and Bentham. Butler's Sermons appeared
in 1726, the year after the publication of Hutcheson's two first
essays, and the parallelism between the "conscience" of the one writer
and the "moral sense" of the other is, at least, worthy of remark. In
the sphere of mental philosophy and logic Hutcheson's contributions are
by no means so important or original as in that of moral philosophy.
They are interesting mainly as a link between Locke and the Scottish
school. In the former subject the influence of Locke is apparent
throughout. All the main outlines of Locke's philosophy seem, at first
sight, to be accepted as a matter of course. Thus, in stating his
theory of the moral sense, Hutcheson is peculiarly careful to repudiate
the doctrine of innate ideas. At the same time he shows more discrimination than
does Locke in distinguishing between the two uses of this expression,
and between the legitimate and illegitimate form of the doctrine. The short Compendium of Logic,
which is more original than such works usually are, is remarkable
chiefly for the large proportion of psychological matter that it
contains. In these parts of the book Hutcheson mainly follows Locke.
The technicalities of the subject are passed lightly over, and the book
is readable. It may be specially noticed that he distinguishes between
the mental result and its verbal expression judgment-proposition, that
he constantly employs the word "idea," and that he defines logical truth as "convenientia signorum cum rebus significatis" (or "propositionis convenientia cum rebus ipsis," Syn. Metaph. pars i. cap 3), thus implicitly repudiating a merely formal view of logic. Hutcheson
may further be regarded as one of the earliest modern writers on
aesthetics. His speculations on this subject are contained in the Inquiry concerning Beauty, Order, Harmony and Design,
the first of the two treatises published in 1725. He maintains that we
are endowed with a special sense by which we perceive beauty, harmony
and proportion. This is a reflex sense, because it presupposes the
action of the external senses of sight and hearing. It may be called an
internal sense, both to distinguish its perceptions from the mere
perceptions of sight and hearing, and because "in some other affairs,
where our external senses are not much concerned, we discern a sort of
beauty, very like in many respects to that observed in sensible
objects, and accompanied with like pleasure" (Inquiry, etc.,
sect. 1, XI). The latter reason leads him to call attention to the
beauty perceived in universal truths, in the operations of general
causes and in moral principles and actions. Thus, the analogy between
beauty and virtue, which was so favourite a topic with Shaftesbury, is
prominent in the writings of Hutcheson also. Scattered up and down the
treatise there are many important and interesting observations that our
limits prevent us from noticing. But to the student of mental
philosophy it may be specially interesting to remark that Hutcheson
both applies the principle of association to explain our ideas of
beauty and also sets limits to its application, insisting on there
being "a natural power of perception or sense of beauty in objects,
antecedent to all custom, education or example" (see Inquiry, etc.,
sects. 6, 7; Hamilton's Lectures on Metaphysics, Lect. 44 ad fin.). Hutcheson's
writings naturally gave rise to much controversy. To say nothing of
minor opponents, such as "Philaretus" (Gilbert Burnet), Dr John Balguy (1686 - 1748), prebendary of Salisbury, the author of
two tracts on "The Foundation of Moral Goodness, and Dr John Taylor
(1694 - 1761) of Norwich, a minister of considerable reputation in his
time (author of An Examination of the Scheme of Amorality advanced by Dr Hutcheson),
the essays appear to have suggested, by antagonism, at least two works
that hold a permanent place in the literature of English ethics — Butler's Dissertation on the Nature of Virtue, and Richard Price's Treatise of Moral Good and Evil (1757).
In this latter work the author maintains, in opposition to Hutcheson,
that actions are in themselves right or wrong, that right and wrong
are simple ideas incapable of analysis, and that these ideas are
perceived immediately by the understanding. We thus see that, not only
directly but also through the replies that it called forth, the system
of Hutcheson, or at least the system of Hutcheson combined with that of
Shaftesbury, contributed, in large measure, to the formation and
development of some of the most important of the modern schools of
ethics.
References
to Hutcheson occur in histories, both of general philosophy and of
moral philosophy. Norman Fiering, a specialist in the intellectual history of colonial New England, has described Francis Hutcheson as “probably the most influential and respected moral philosopher in America in the eighteenth century.” Hutcheson's early Inquiry into the Original of Our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue, introducing his perennial association of "unalienable rights" with the collective right to resist oppressive government, was used at Harvard College as a textbook as early as the 1730s. In
1761, Hutcheson was publicly endorsed in the annual semi-official
Massachusetts Election Sermon as "an approved writer on ethics." Hutcheson's Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy was used as a textbook at the College of Philadelphia in the 1760s. Francis Alison,
the professor of moral philosophy at the College of Philadelphia, was a
former student of Hutcheson who closely followed Hutcheson’s thought. Alison's students included "a surprisingly large number of active, well-known patriots,” including three signers of the Declaration of Independence, who "learned their patriotic principles from Hutcheson and Alison.” Another signer of the Declaration of Independence, John Witherspoon of the College of New Jersey (now Princeton University), relied heavily on Hutcheson's views in his own lectures on moral philosophy. John Adams read Hutcheson's Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy shortly after graduating from Harvard. Garry Wills argued in 1978 that the phrasing of the Declaration of Independence was due largely to Hutcheson's influence, but Wills's work suffered a scathing rebuttal from Ronald Hamowy. Wills'
view has been partially supported by Samuel Fleischacker, who agreed
that it is "perfectly reasonable to see Hutcheson’s influence behind
the appeals to sentiment that Jefferson put into his draft of the
Declaration." |